The New York Times, The Arts, Thursday, May 24,
2001
Being Met At the Airport By New Art
Big, Bold Installations For a Rebuilt Kennedy Arrivals Terminal
By CELESTINE BOHLEN
At most international airports, arriving passengers are treated
as an afterthought. The departures area gets the attention: the
soaring ceilings, the giant mobiles, the grandiose information booths.
But freshly landed travelers are left to fend for themselves through
endless bland corridors, down pokey escalators and into the maw
of passport control.
Using three imposing and intriguing works by New York-area artists,
Terminal 4, the $1.4 billion public-private venture that opens today
at Kennedy International Airport, has gone for a more welcoming
approach. The new terminal, built by an international consortium,
J.F.K.I.A.T., replaces the old International Arrivals Building that
is being demolished.
Spread along arrival Concourses A and B, and above the passport
inspection booths in the Immigration and Naturalization Service
hall, these large, permanent installations give passengers something
to think about as they prepare to enter New York, even the United
States, for the first time, perhaps to stay for the rest of their
lives.
The art reflects what New York has to offer. There is “Travelogues”,
a witty, technologically innovative, multimedia narrative made of
changing images on a row of backlighted screens, created by the
architectural design team of Diller + Scofidio. There is a “Curtain
Wall”, an abstract work by Harry Roseman, a Vassar College
art professor who has used giant curtains made of modified gypsum
to play with themes of cloth and clouds, wind and change homeyness
and high drama. And finally, in a 100-yard-long series of panels
called “New York Streets”, made of brightly painted
relief sculptures in the vast immigration hall, there are 28 glimpses
of life in New York neighborhoods, from weddings to fish markets,
Coney Island beaches to Saks Fifth Avenue, exhilarated basketball
players in Greenwich Village to exhausted commuters on the No. 7
subway line in Queens.
“I wanted to get across the idea that New York is lively and
energetic but that it is also an extremely fatiguing city,”
said the work’s artist, Deborah Masters, 50. “People
exhaust themselves here.”
The idea for the terminal’s art project was bold from the
start: Ms. Masters used the word gutsy. Many airports have scattered
art through their terminals, but at Kennedy the notion was to go
big, to be noticed.
“We were going for impact,” said Wendy Feuer, the art
consultant for Terminal 4 who once headed the Arts for Transit program
in the New York subway system. “What we wanted, you get by
giving fewer artists really big commissions. Fortunately, these
artists were up to that, but it took three years of their lives.”
Forty artists were asked to submit proposals when J.F.K.I.A.T.,
the private international consortium that owns and operates Terminal
4, first opened its competition for the artwork that altogether
cost about $1 million. The field was narrowed to nine, and then,
in 1997, to three.
Some art in the terminal cost nothing. The Alexander Calder mobile
“Flight,” in the departure area, was inherited from
the old arrivals building. For the new arrivals hall, a Japanese
company donated a ceramic copy of an Arshile Gorky gouache drawing
done in the 1930’s as a study for his murals, now destroyed,
at the Newark airport.
Mr.
Roseman, another veteran of the Arts for Transit program, had done
a bronze relief of a landscape at the Wall Street subway station.
He recently walked past his newest public work: 30 sculptures that
give the appearance of flowing, flapping white material as they
stretch down a 600-foot wall along Concourse B.
“I spent months blowing material around,” said Mr. Roseman,
a photographer whose portraits of the artist Joseph Cornell were
recently exhibited at the Menil Collection in Houston.
“Curtain Wall” starts at the top of the concourse’s
ramp, on a straight wall where the “curtains,” seven-feet
high at that point, hang with domestic calm and dignity. But as
they extend down the incline, the curtains seem to move, billowing
sideways and up, swirling until they look more like clouds against
they wall’s striking blue color, itself part of the installation.
“You can’t imagine how long it took to get that blue,”
Mr. Roseman said proudly.
By the bottom of the ramp, the curtains are 14-feet high and their
folds slow into the next room, the immigration hall. The sequence
is repeated – more or less – on Concourse A, which is
40 feet shorter than Concourse B. The concourses end at the immigration
hall.
Mr. Roseman and Diller + Scofidio had to duplicate some of their
work for the two concourses, known in airport lingo as sterile corridors
because they are a no man’s land where travelers are on American
soul but have no yet entered the United States.
The concept of sterile corridors and their state of suspended identity
was part of what attracted Elizabeth Diller, an architecture professor
at Princeton University and her husband and partner, Ricardo Scofidio,
who teaches architecture at Cooper Union, to the project.
“We were very enthusiastic about the banality of these very
long corridors,” Ms. Diller said. “It is a space of
limbo, which is very compelling.”
Diller + Scofidio have tackled many challenging conceptual projects,
including the structure they call the Blur Building, built for Expo
’02 in Switzerland in a mist off the banks of Lake Neuchatel.
But the airport project allowed them to deal with several of their
favorite notions at once.
“It intersected some of the themes that have woven their way
through a lot of our work, one of which is contemporary tourism,”
Ms. Diller said. “This was right up our alley.”
One of the conditions set forth by J.F.K.I.A.T. was that the art
be low maintenance, which banned interactive installations that
can – and so often do – breakdown or go wrong. This
led Ms. Diller and Mr. Scofidio to lenticular technology, which
uses ribbed plastic, covered with rows of lenses, to create the
illusion of moving images and three dimensions.
“We didn’t know much about lenticular, but it was possible
with zero maintenance, you could get something that is both sophisticated
and very primitive,” Ms. Diller said.
A result is something of a cool postmodern cartoon strip strung
along a row of screens that project images that look three-dimensional
but rather are a sequence of pictures scanned in 30 positions. Altogether
there are three stories, or “Travelogues,” each told
through a collection of vignettes centered on a suitcase. As Ms.
Diller puts it, the suitcase is the “highly edited version
of one’s home or travels.”
In one story, “The Collector,” there is the intriguing
scene at a table set in front of the Leaning Tower of Pisa, where
a man tosses a pair of dice, followed by a scene in which his female
companion responds by tossing a glace of red wine at his white shirt.
The glass and a souvenir of the tower show up in an X-ray image
of a suitcase.
For the traveler, who has first passed “Travelogues”
and then “Curtain Wall,” the finale is “New York
Streets,” drawn from scenes captured on the 70 rolls of film
that Ms. Masters shot in a two-day tour of the city.
“ I wanted the feeling of rushing through, and I wanted things
that immigrants would see when they come here,” she said.
Narratively and geographically, Ms. Masters’s panels are the
conclusion of the new terminal’s art project. “The panels
are about the neighborhoods, the guys of New York,” Ms. Feuer
said. “You start with Diller + Scofidio, which is about the
New York that is slick and cool. Then there is Harry Roseman, abstract
but concrete. But when you walk into the immigration hall, you have
arrived.
|